Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become the centerpiece of modern innovation strategies across industries, promising automation, insight, and competitive advantage. Yet, despite the hype, a strikingly large percentage of AI projects fail—recent industry studies suggest that 70% to 85% of initiatives never make it to production or fail to deliver value. Follow-up studies by companies like Deloitte and RAND surface a common theme from the organizational challenges of developing AI capabilities: AI success is not just a technical challenge—it’s a strategic one.
Generative AI is rapidly unlocking new online capabilities. But the real challenge isn't starting an AI project—it's making sure it delivers measurable value and avoids expensive missteps.
Too often, teams rush from idea to prototype, driven by the accessibility of generative AI and ready-made tools. What’s often missing is a clear, structured checkpoint: a disciplined moment to align on business objectives, validate early assumptions, and evaluate risks before moving forward.
In an environment where enthusiasm often outpaces execution, an AI scorecard can be a powerful compass. It helps avoid the common traps—vague objectives, underprepared data, tech-for-tech’s-sake implementations—and sets teams on a path of deliberate, accountable, and scalable innovation.
A scorecard isn’t just a checklist—it’s a structured way to evaluate readiness, progress, risk, and value across every stage of an AI project. It helps you create the most important guiding principle of how to define value and get the most out of your AI work.
Many AI initiatives fail because they don’t solve a meaningful business problem or aren't linked to specific KPIs. A scorecard ensures each project is grounded in a business case with measurable impact, bridging the communication gap between technical teams and business stakeholders.
Data quality, availability, and governance are top reasons projects stall. A scorecard helps evaluate whether the data is AI-ready—relevant, labeled, secure, and compliant. This forces teams to assess foundational infrastructure before diving into model building.
AI is not plug-and-play. Teams need skills, workflows, and change management structures to support adoption. A scorecard can assess maturity in these areas and highlight training or leadership alignment gaps.
According to recent analyses, many generative AI projects falter because of underestimated costs—especially at scale. A well-designed scorecard surfaces cost expectations tied to infrastructure, APIs, model retraining, and security protocols, helping to set realistic budgets from day one. If you’ve decided what is considered a good output, knowing the technical lift required to get there will help in this regard.
Rather than betting on one massive deployment, scorecards encourage smaller, iterative projects with gated go/no-go decisions. This phased approach increases learning, reduces sunk cost risk, and improves time-to-value.
Some questions to ask as you build your AI project scorecard:
In short, if your organization is investing in AI, it should also be investing in how you measure AI maturity, success, and risk—and the scorecard is where that discipline begins.
If you are curious about your AI/ML strategy or maturity, or if you want to explore building a scorecard in support of your AI initiatives, then drop us a line at sales@ipponusa.com.
Sources:
https://myplanb.ai/why-85-of-ai-projects-fail/